Indian historical studies, but which is seen in recent decades as being deeply problematic. From 1790 to 1802, in the history of british india james mill pdf to holding various tutorships, he occupied himself with historical and philosophical studies. In 1804, he wrote a pamphlet on the corn trade, arguing against a bounty on the exportation of grain.
He adopted Bentham’s principles in their entirety, and determined to devote all his energies to bringing them before the world. 1813, his first known article being “Money and Exchange. 1808 two articles of his are traced—a “Review of Fox’s History,” and an article on “Bentham’s Law Reforms,” probably his first published notice of Bentham. It brought about a change in the author’s fortunes. The year following he was appointed an official in the India House, in the important department of the examiner of Indian correspondence. From 1831 to 1833, Mill was largely occupied in the defence of the East India Company, during the controversy attending the renewal of its charter, he being in virtue of his office the spokesman of the court of directors.
Mill, himself was an atheist. England and later the United Kingdom. The work itself, and the author’s official connection with India for the last seventeen years of his life, effected a complete change in the whole system of governance in the country. Mill never visited the Indian colony, relying solely on documentary material and archival records in compiling his work. British Indophobia and hostility to Orientalism”. In the chapter titled General Reflections in “Of the Hindus”, Mill wrote “under the glosing exterior of the Hindu, lies a general disposition to deceit and perfidy”. Hindoo like the eunuch, excels in the qualities of a slave”.
Furthermore, similar to the Chinese, the Hindoos were “dissembling, treacherous, mendacious, to an excess which surpasses even the usual measure of uncultivated society”. Both the Chinese and the Hindoos were “disposed to excessive exaggeration with regard to everything relating to themselves”. Both were “cowardly and unfeeling”. Both were “in the highest degree conceited of themselves, and full of affected contempt for others”.
And, above all, both were “in physical sense, disgustingly unclean in their persons and houses”. Mill acquired a position in the history of psychology and ethics. He carried out the principle of association into the analysis of the complex emotional states, as the affections, the aesthetic emotions and the moral sentiment, all which he endeavoured to resolve into pleasurable and painful sensations. Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind. Tod vs Mill: Clashing Perspectives on British Rule in India and Indian Civilization”. Mumbai: Radhika Sabavala for Marg Publications on behalf of the National Centre for the Performing Arts.